- I think every child that is going to school, MUST be provided lunch by their parents or caregivers.
- Children NEED lunches, because if not children will starve, and if they don't eat anything for 8 hours they may not get enough protein, and we need protein because it is important for muscle growth, and they might not be able to learn.
- But if children are being provided with a healthy packed lunch, then the children wouldn't have to starve, and they will also learn better.
- Children will also need a water bottle just in case they are thirsty, or maybe need it for after doing sports, or any physical activities.
Introduction:
Would children learn better if lunches were provided by the school?
In my opinion. I think children would learn better if lunches were provided, but not by the school, but by the parents or caregivers, and here is why i think that..
The reason why I think it should be provided by parents, or anyone who is looking after them, is because I believe that its a parents responsibility, just like how they drive or walk them to school. And if a child does go to school, without a packed lunch, then it basically just means that they are going to school, and not eating anything for 8 hours. And not only will they starve, but they might not also have enough protein, and we all need protein, and they also might not be able to learn better.
I believe that if children are being provided with lunch then, i think children wouldn't have to starve for 8 hours, and being provided healthy lunch is the best choice because then they could have nutrition throughout the day to learn, and focus in class.
Not only will a child need a healthy packed lunch, but u think they should also have a drink bottle with them to take to school, because they might be thirsty throughout the day, so they wont be dehydrated, and drinking water can also give them more energy to be able to play sports and physical activities at school.
Conclusion:
So I believe that children who are going to school without lunch, should be provided lunch, because of all those reasons, and of course because they might have to starve, and especially a young child having to starve is not good for them. So " Would children learn better if lunches were provided by the school"?, my answer to that is, " yes they would learn better if lunches were provided, but I think parents and caregivers should provide them lunches because its their responsibility, and I think parents would love preparing lunches for their kids. What do you think?
- But if children are being provided with a healthy packed lunch, then the children wouldn't have to starve, and they will also learn better.
- Children will also need a water bottle just in case they are thirsty, or maybe need it for after doing sports, or any physical activities.
Introduction:
Would children learn better if lunches were provided by the school?
In my opinion. I think children would learn better if lunches were provided, but not by the school, but by the parents or caregivers, and here is why i think that..
The reason why I think it should be provided by parents, or anyone who is looking after them, is because I believe that its a parents responsibility, just like how they drive or walk them to school. And if a child does go to school, without a packed lunch, then it basically just means that they are going to school, and not eating anything for 8 hours. And not only will they starve, but they might not also have enough protein, and we all need protein, and they also might not be able to learn better.
I believe that if children are being provided with lunch then, i think children wouldn't have to starve for 8 hours, and being provided healthy lunch is the best choice because then they could have nutrition throughout the day to learn, and focus in class.
Not only will a child need a healthy packed lunch, but u think they should also have a drink bottle with them to take to school, because they might be thirsty throughout the day, so they wont be dehydrated, and drinking water can also give them more energy to be able to play sports and physical activities at school.
Conclusion:
So I believe that children who are going to school without lunch, should be provided lunch, because of all those reasons, and of course because they might have to starve, and especially a young child having to starve is not good for them. So " Would children learn better if lunches were provided by the school"?, my answer to that is, " yes they would learn better if lunches were provided, but I think parents and caregivers should provide them lunches because its their responsibility, and I think parents would love preparing lunches for their kids. What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment